<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s change in position regarding the keyword &#8220;abortion&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metamanager.net/2008/09/googles-change-in-position-regarding-the-keyword-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metamanager.net/2008/09/googles-change-in-position-regarding-the-keyword-abortion/</link>
	<description>Reflections on Virtual Organization and its Social Significance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 03:21:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zzzeroX</title>
		<link>http://www.metamanager.net/2008/09/googles-change-in-position-regarding-the-keyword-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>zzzeroX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metamanager.net/?p=15#comment-76</guid>
		<description>I can understand Google&#039;s former position since some anti-abortion groups are known terrorist organizations and their tactics in general are often questionable.  Should Google allow Osama bin Laden to use the &quot;Jihad&quot; keyword in the name of free speech?  Perhaps...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand Google&#8217;s former position since some anti-abortion groups are known terrorist organizations and their tactics in general are often questionable.  Should Google allow Osama bin Laden to use the &#8220;Jihad&#8221; keyword in the name of free speech?  Perhaps&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
